an open letter to The Walrus: on why “chinaman” jokes are not acceptable

posted by jroselkim

Dear Editors of The Walrus,

I was really enjoying reading Noah Richler’s feature “My Dad, the Movie, and Me” until an unexpected racist joke hit me like a ton of bricks towards the end of the piece. Mr. Richler describes a conversation he has with his best friend, who tells what Mr. Richler describes as “his signature punster’s bad jokes.”

“Noah, when does a Chinaman go to the dentist?” he asked.

“I dunno, pal. When?”

“Tooth-hurty.” (p.48)

Mr. Richler states that this “joke” occurred after his father’s death, so I can safely say this happened sometime after 2001. Little did I know that “a Chinaman” was still used as a “funny” term in the 21st century. I was also unaware that we were still okay with making jokes about the hilarious ways that Asian people speak. Because those Asian people, they just can’t speak English correctly, no matter how long they’ve been living here, right? And those silly Chinamen – many of whom worked under terrible conditions to build our railways – they still deserve those awesomely bad puns after all these years, don’t they?

I’m not sure if that qualifier “bad” Mr. Richler uses in the piece sufficiently describes the kind of offensive attitude his friend exhibited. Do we still live in a society where we make bad puns about the “others” and print them without thinking twice? Frankly, I am equally appalled that the editors and the copy editors at The Walrus let this joke pass on to the public (many of whom are – inevitably – of Asian origin). It makes me feel ashamed to be subscribing to a magazine (which prides itself in serious, in-depth journalism) that is in fact so blind to a hurtful racial stereotype.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “an open letter to The Walrus: on why “chinaman” jokes are not acceptable

  1. Celine

    I have found that the Walrus is written strictly from a privileged point of view without even an ounce of clue about its politics and its position within the community that supports them. It’s so busy pretending to be apolitical by being whimsy and cute. Friends, you’re a media outlet, you are incapable of being “apolitical”.

    Anyway, I am not particularly surprised that they just did it. And they’re going to get away with it, smugly. Now, watch them say in their defense,”it was just a joke.” I think you should unsubscribe. I did a while back and have never looked back.

    • jroselkim

      Yeah, I doubt they’d even print my letter, but we’ll see I guess. I was tempted to renew my subscription (this current one was a gift) but I think I might just save my money and get my news from the interwebs like a good 21st-century citizen.

  2. Pingback: Pet Peeve 3: newspaper thievery « What Are Years?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s